On 28/06/2017 03:42, jos...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:10:55PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> On 23/06/2017 11:21, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:31:24PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> On 22.06.2017 13:26, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>> CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1 is 0x004E0100, so this is the POWER9 v1.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> When we run qemu on a POWER9 DD1 host, we must use either
>>>>> "-cpu host" or "-cpu POWER9", but in the latter case it fails with
>>>>>
>>>>> Unable to find sPAPR CPU Core definition
>>>>>
>>>>> because POWER9 DD1 doesn't appear in the list of known CPUs.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes this by defining POWER9_v1.0 with POWER9 DD1
>>>>> PVR instead of CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> target/ppc/cpu-models.c | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu-models.c b/target/ppc/cpu-models.c
>>>>> index 4d3e635..a22363c 100644
>>>>> --- a/target/ppc/cpu-models.c
>>>>> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu-models.c
>>>>> @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@
>>>>> POWERPC_DEF("970_v2.2", CPU_POWERPC_970_v22, 970,
>>>>> "PowerPC 970 v2.2")
>>>>>
>>>>> - POWERPC_DEF("POWER9_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE,
>>>>> POWER9,
>>>>> + POWERPC_DEF("POWER9_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1,
>>>>> POWER9,
>>>>> "POWER9 v1.0")
>>>>>
>>>>> POWERPC_DEF("970fx_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_970FX_v10, 970,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think this also makes sense for running in TCG mode to get a valid
>>>> real PVR there.
>>>
>>> I'm not so convinced.
>>>
>>> IIUC, this will make TCG default (for now) to a DD1 POWER9. That's a)
>>> probably not what anyone wants - who'd select a buggy prototype and b)
>>> not accurate - TCG does not implement DD1's bugs.
>>
>> According to the POWER8 user manual (I didn't fine the POWER9 one):
>>
>> "3.6.3.1 Processor Version Register (PVR)
>>
>> The processor revision level (PVR[16:31]) starts at x‘0100’, indicating
>> revision ‘1.0’. As revisions are made, bits [29:31] will indicate minor
>> revisions. Similarly, bits [20:23] indicate major changes."
>>
>> POWER9 DD1 PVR is 0x004E0100, so this is really version 1.0 of the POWER9.
>>
>> Perhaps we can define POWER9_v1.0 as CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1, and
>> introduce a POWER9_v0.0 set to CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE and define it as
>> the default one?
>
> I like the suggestion to set a v0.0 to CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE. But, I
> think we could have only that option, removing the
> CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1 entry. Then, we add the v2.0 (when ready) as the CPU
> emulated by TCG.
>
> To TCG, DD1 wouldn't be listed because it cannot be emulated today.
>
> What do you think?
We need the POWER9 DD1 in the list to be able to start QEMU on DD1 host
with "-cpu POWER9" (it works with "-cpu host"). The real question is to
what we should set the default CPU when it is not provided on the CLI.
I agree that using POWER9 DD1 to boot a kernel with TCG will confuse the
kernel.
we could set POWER9 DD1 PVR to define the "POWER9_v1.0", and add a
"POWER9_tcg" (?) set to CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE to use with tcg until we
have the PVR of a public release of POWER9?
Thanks,
Laurent
