On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:25:55 +0100
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote:

> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> > On 22 June 2017 at 18:03, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote:  
> > > Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> wrote:  
> > >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:14:08 +0100
> > >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>  
> > >>> On 22 June 2017 at 17:06, Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> wrote:  
> > >>> > Function types cannot reside in the same sorted list as opaque types 
> > >>> > since
> > >>> > they may depend on a type which would be defined later.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Of course, the same problem could arise if a function type depends on
> > >>> > another function type with greater alphabetical order. Hopefully we
> > >>> > don't have that at this time.  
> > >>>
> > >>> The other approach would be to put function types somewhere
> > >>> else and leave typedefs.h for the simple 'opaque types
> > >>> for structures' that it was started as.
> > >>>
> > >>> For instance we have include/qemu/fprintf-fn.h as a precedent.
> > >>>  
> > >>
> > >> Indeed, and I'm not quite sure why Juan decided to put these types into
> > >> typedefs.h instead of a dedicated header file in include/migration... is
> > >> it only because it was the quickest fix ?  
> > >
> > > All other typedefs were defined there.  I can create a different include
> > > file, but I think that is "overengineering", no?  They are typedefs,
> > > just not of structs.  But I agree that they are the only ones.  
> > 
> > Well, the comment in the file says "opaque types so that device init
> > declarations don't have to pull in all the real definitions", whereas
> > the ones you've added aren't opaque types, they are the real
> > definitions. They're also only used by a very small subset of .c
> > files, whereas typedefs.h goes everywhere.  
> 
> mv fprintf-fn.f   fn-typedefs.h
> 
> move those two defs into that?
> 

Wouldn't it be more appropriate to put them in a dedicated
include/migration/handler-fn.h header included by both
vmstate.h and register.h ?

> Dave
> 
> > thanks
> > -- PMM  
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> 

Attachment: pgpGuZ6GHJqtm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to