Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 19 June 2017 at 11:46, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >> This is a precursor to record/playback support. Instead of passing the >> socket fd we now pass helper functions for reading/writing and >> responding. This will allow us to do the rest of the record/playback >> cleanly outside of the main worker function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> v5 >> - re-base without tab/format cleanps >> v4 >> - split header code >> - fix formatting foo-bar's >> v3 >> - new for v3 >> - arm, aarch64, ppc64 >> --- >> reginfo.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> risu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- >> risu.h | 11 +++++++++-- >> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/reginfo.c b/reginfo.c >> index 31bb99f..90cea8f 100644 >> --- a/reginfo.c >> +++ b/reginfo.c >> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ uint8_t apprentice_memblock[MEMBLOCKLEN]; >> static int mem_used; >> static int packet_mismatch; >> >> -int send_register_info(int sock, void *uc) >> +int send_register_info(write_fn write_fn, void *uc) >> { >> struct reginfo ri; >> int op; >> @@ -29,24 +29,25 @@ int send_register_info(int sock, void *uc) >> op = get_risuop(&ri); >> >> switch (op) { >> - case OP_COMPARE: >> case OP_TESTEND: >> - default: >> - /* Do a simple register compare on (a) explicit request >> - * (b) end of test (c) a non-risuop UNDEF >> - */ >> - return send_data_pkt(sock, &ri, sizeof(ri)); >> + write_fn(&ri, sizeof(ri)); >> + return 1; > > Why the change from "return write function's return value" > to "ignore return value and always return 1" for OP_TESTEND ?
Hmm possibly a re-base snaggle. I'll fix it up. > >> case OP_COMPAREMEM: >> - return send_data_pkt(sock, memblock, MEMBLOCKLEN); >> + return write_fn(memblock, MEMBLOCKLEN); >> break; > > ...here we still just pass the return value through, for instance. > >> + case OP_COMPARE: >> + default: >> + /* Do a simple register compare on (a) explicit request >> + * (b) end of test (c) a non-risuop UNDEF >> + */ >> + return write_fn(&ri, sizeof(ri)); >> } >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ int send_register_info(int sock, void *uc) >> * that says whether it is register or memory data, so if the two >> * sides get out of sync then we will fail obscurely. >> */ >> -int recv_and_compare_register_info(int sock, void *uc) >> +int recv_and_compare_register_info(read_fn read_fn, respond_fn resp_fn, >> void *uc) >> { >> int resp = 0, op; >> >> @@ -73,36 +74,34 @@ int recv_and_compare_register_info(int sock, void *uc) >> /* Do a simple register compare on (a) explicit request >> * (b) end of test (c) a non-risuop UNDEF >> */ >> - if (recv_data_pkt(sock, &apprentice_ri, sizeof(apprentice_ri))) { >> + if (read_fn(&apprentice_ri, sizeof(apprentice_ri))) { >> packet_mismatch = 1; >> resp = 2; >> - >> } else if (!reginfo_is_eq(&master_ri, &apprentice_ri)) { >> /* register mismatch */ >> resp = 2; >> - >> } else if (op == OP_TESTEND) { >> resp = 1; >> } >> - send_response_byte(sock, resp); >> + resp_fn(resp); >> break; >> case OP_SETMEMBLOCK: >> - memblock = (void *) (uintptr_t) get_reginfo_paramreg(&master_ri); >> + memblock = (void *)(uintptr_t)get_reginfo_paramreg(&master_ri); >> break; >> case OP_GETMEMBLOCK: >> set_ucontext_paramreg(uc, get_reginfo_paramreg(&master_ri) + >> - (uintptr_t) memblock); >> + (uintptr_t)memblock); >> break; >> case OP_COMPAREMEM: >> mem_used = 1; >> - if (recv_data_pkt(sock, apprentice_memblock, MEMBLOCKLEN)) { >> + if (read_fn(apprentice_memblock, MEMBLOCKLEN)) { >> packet_mismatch = 1; >> resp = 2; >> } else if (memcmp(memblock, apprentice_memblock, MEMBLOCKLEN) != 0) >> { >> /* memory mismatch */ >> resp = 2; >> } >> - send_response_byte(sock, resp); >> + resp_fn(resp); >> break; >> } >> >> diff --git a/risu.c b/risu.c >> index a10422a..88e586c 100644 >> --- a/risu.c >> +++ b/risu.c >> @@ -37,9 +37,28 @@ sigjmp_buf jmpbuf; >> /* Should we test for FP exception status bits? */ >> int test_fp_exc; >> >> +/* Master functions */ >> + >> +int read_sock(void *ptr, size_t bytes) >> +{ >> + return recv_data_pkt(master_socket, ptr, bytes); >> +} >> + >> +void respond_sock(int r) >> +{ >> + send_response_byte(master_socket, r); >> +} >> + >> +/* Apprentice function */ >> + >> +int write_sock(void *ptr, size_t bytes) >> +{ >> + return send_data_pkt(apprentice_socket, ptr, bytes); >> +} >> + >> void master_sigill(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *uc) >> { >> - switch (recv_and_compare_register_info(master_socket, uc)) { >> + switch (recv_and_compare_register_info(read_sock, respond_sock, uc)) { >> case 0: >> /* match OK */ >> advance_pc(uc); >> @@ -52,7 +71,7 @@ void master_sigill(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *uc) >> >> void apprentice_sigill(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *uc) >> { >> - switch (send_register_info(apprentice_socket, uc)) { >> + switch (send_register_info(write_sock, uc)) { >> case 0: >> /* match OK */ >> advance_pc(uc); >> diff --git a/risu.h b/risu.h >> index 78a7313..32241bc 100644 >> --- a/risu.h >> +++ b/risu.h >> @@ -53,17 +53,24 @@ struct reginfo; >> >> /* Functions operating on reginfo */ >> >> +/* To keep the read/write logic from multiplying across all arches >> + * we wrap up the function here to keep all the changes in one place >> + */ > > Stale comment? The calling code is not per-arch any more. Yes, I'll remove > >> +typedef int (*write_fn) (void *ptr, size_t bytes); >> +typedef int (*read_fn) (void *ptr, size_t bytes); >> +typedef void (*respond_fn) (int response); >> + >> /* Send the register information from the struct ucontext down the socket. >> * Return the response code from the master. >> * NB: called from a signal handler. >> */ >> -int send_register_info(int sock, void *uc); >> +int send_register_info(write_fn write_fn, void *uc); >> >> /* Read register info from the socket and compare it with that from the >> * ucontext. Return 0 for match, 1 for end-of-test, 2 for mismatch. >> * NB: called from a signal handler. >> */ >> -int recv_and_compare_register_info(int sock, void *uc); >> +int recv_and_compare_register_info(read_fn read_fn, respond_fn respond, >> void *uc); >> >> /* Print a useful report on the status of the last comparison >> * done in recv_and_compare_register_info(). This is called on >> -- >> 2.13.0 >> > > thanks > -- PMM -- Alex Bennée