On 01/06/2017 10:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > On 31/05/2017 11:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> No, for now I'd rather just go and remove msi_nonbroken. When someone >> reports a bug, we can add back "msi_broken". > > Hi, > I agree with the direction, but I am concerned msi_nonbroken is there > for a reason. > We might break some (obscure/not in use) machine. > Maybe we should CC all arch machine maintainers/contributors to give > them a chance to object...
Yeah, Alpha, MIPS and SH are those that support PCI. Adding Richard and Aurelien, do your platforms support MSI on real hardware but not in QEMU? Thanks, Paolo
