On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 13:19 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 05/02/2017 01:09 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:59 PM Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > wrote: > > > >> And who is going to implement that qemu-swtpm? Obviously this discussion > >> doesn't contribute to progress if nobody is doing that in the end. > >> > > The same persons who try to push for that emulated TPM code. The easiest > > approach would be to copy/adapt the swtpm code in qemu, if the licence is > > compatible. I can help with that if there is a consensus it's a better > > approach. > > > It's a matter of time and at least I don't have time for that.
Neither do I, and nor (I believe) does Amarnath. The approach with using the existing swtpm project seemed attractive to us exactly because it avoids having to write and maintain more than just the glue code between the two projects. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.
