Am 26.04.2017 um 10:40 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben: > tail_padding_bytes is calculated wrong. F.e. for > offset = 0 > bytes = 2048 > align = 512 > we will have tail_padding_bytes = 512 which is definitely wrong. The patch > fixes that arithmetics. > > Fortunately this problem is harmless, we will have 1 extra allocation and > free thus there is no need to put this into stable. The problem is here > from the very beginning. > > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <d...@openvz.org> > CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > CC: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
Thanks, applied to block-next. Kevin
