On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 04/25/2017 03:31 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On 25 April 2017 at 07:51, Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org> wrote: > >> Currenlty, the code relies on the fact that open() handles NULL > >> filenames but that can cause an error with new clang: > >> > >> hw/core/loader.c:67:15: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1, > >> which is declared to never be null > > > > This isn't "new clang", incidentally, it's just clang with the > > runtime-static-analysis enabled, which causes warnings to be > > printed at runtime for undefined behaviours. You can enable > > this by passing configure --extra-cflags=-fsanitize=undefined . > > (I have clang 3.8.0 here.) > > OK. So I have now reproduced the issue on a f24. That made be > realize that the IPMI tests check for the arch they are being > run on and that more changes are required for them to run on > ppc64. > > We can drop patch 1/2. Tell me if you want a resend.
No, that's fine. A patch to enable the tests on ppc properly ASAP
would be great, though.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
