On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:19:24 -0500
Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 08:32 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > if board supports CpuInstanceProperties, report them for
> > each CPU thread listed. Main motivation for this is to
> > provide these properties introspection via QMP interface
> > for using in test cases to verify numa node to cpu mapping,
> > which includes not only boards that support cpu hotplug
> > and have this info in query-hotpluggable-cpus (pc/spapr)
> > but also for boards that don't not support hotpluggable-cpus
> > but support numa mapping (virt-arm).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> > ---
>
> > @@ -1860,6 +1863,12 @@ CpuInfoList *qmp_query_cpus(Error **errp)
> > #else
> > info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_OTHER;
> > #endif
> > + if ((info->value->has_props = !!mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props))
> > {
>
> checkpatch.pl doesn't flag that? We generally try to avoid side-effects
> inside conditionals.
it does, fixed in v2 branch
(lazy me skipped checkpatch since QMP test case been added,
I've also fixed another checkpatch error in the next patch)
> > + CpuInstanceProperties *props;
> > + props = g_malloc0(sizeof(*props));
> > + *props = mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props(ms, cpu->cpu_index);
> > + info->value->props = props;
>
> Why two spaces after =?
fixed
>
> With those cleaned up,
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Thanks!
