Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 20 March 2017 at 16:29, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >>> I have some comments which feel kind of nit-picky, but since this >>> is a public-facing HMP API I think they need attention since we only >>> get one chance to get it right. >> >> HMP is not a stable interface. If we get it wrong, we change it. If >> our change breaks your usage, you get to keep the pieces. > > Oh yes, I had my HMP and QMP the wrong way round. > > ...which reminds me that I thought we preferred all HMP commands > to be implemented in terms of their QMP equivalent ?
Yes. We make exceptions for commands we believe have no QMP use, such as "print". I figure the rationale for these is "just for testing". Paolo, can you confirm?
