Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> I'm proposing this is 2.9 because it fixes a documentation regression. >> It affects only documentation; generated C code is unchanged except >> for the removal of trailing space in PATCH 46. [...] > Except the few comments and questions I left, the series looks good to me. > I don't think we need to rush it in the 2.9 release though, but I will let > the maintainers decide how to deal with the planning and rules.
Letting documentation quality regress in 2.9 wouldn't be the end of the world, but this series is as safe as they get, despite its size. Thanks for your review!
