On 10/03/2017 11:53, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 10.03.2017 12:22, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 10 March 2017 at 12:07, Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 2017年03月09日 18:20, Yongbok Kim wrote: >>>> Indeed but we still use the platform to verify architectural >>>> compatibilities even for newer MIPS architectures. >> >>> I see, but I believe it may need some modifications in the code to support >>> newer architectures? If yes, plan to send them upstream? Since it has been >>> deprecated, if no new codes it makes sense to deprecate it in qemu too. You >>> can still use exist qemu versions to do the verification. >> >> Taking a step back, the reason for deprecating and deleting >> code is to avoid having unmaintained and unused code in QEMU. >> If Yongbok is maintaining the mipssim board and devices >> and is willing to keep them up to spec with current QOM >> and other best practices, and there are test images to >> check they still work, I think that's fine. > > But the Mipssim machine is currently marked as "Orphan" in our > MAINTAINERS file ... Yongbok, if you're still using it, would you maybe > be interested in doing at least "Odd fixes" here? > BTW, I think "F: hw/net/mipsnet.c" should be added to the "Mipssim" > section, too. > > Thomas >
Yes I am willing to maintain the machine. I will post a patch to the MAINTAINERS file for the machine and other MIPS machines. Regards, Yongbok
