On 2017年03月09日 20:05, Laurent Vivier wrote:
On 09/03/2017 12:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:MSI-X has been disabled by the time the e1000e device is unrealized, hence msix_uninit is never called. This causes the object to be leaked, which shows up as a RAMBlock with empty name when attempting migration. Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> --- hw/net/e1000e.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/net/e1000e.c b/hw/net/e1000e.c index b0f429b..6e23493 100644 --- a/hw/net/e1000e.c +++ b/hw/net/e1000e.c @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ e1000e_init_msix(E1000EState *s) static void e1000e_cleanup_msix(E1000EState *s) { - if (msix_enabled(PCI_DEVICE(s))) { + if (msix_present(PCI_DEVICE(s))) { e1000e_unuse_msix_vectors(s, E1000E_MSIX_VEC_NUM); msix_uninit(PCI_DEVICE(s), &s->msix, &s->msix); }Tested-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
Applied, thanks.
