On 09/03/2017 21:26, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 08:08:00PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> * Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> When a KVM_{GET,SET}_MSRS ioctl() fails, it is difficult to find
>>> out which MSR caused the problem. Print an error message for
>>> debugging, before we trigger the (ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs)
>>> assert.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
>>
>> I'd actually suggest it for 2.9; it's only added debug output.
> 
> I think I agree. The patch is reasonably safe because we would be
> already hitting the assert() if (ret < cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs)
> anyway.
> 
> Paolo, do you want to queue it for 2.9?

Yes, with pleasure.

Paolo

>>
>> Dave
>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>>> * Print error message on KVM_GET_MSRS too
>>>   * Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  target/i386/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
>>> index 887a81268f..705e971a63 100644
>>> --- a/target/i386/kvm.c
>>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
>>> @@ -1807,6 +1807,12 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
>>>          return ret;
>>>      }
>>>  
>>> +    if (ret < cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs) {
>>> +        struct kvm_msr_entry *e = &cpu->kvm_msr_buf->entries[ret];
>>> +        error_report("error: failed to set MSR 0x%" PRIx32 " to 0x%" 
>>> PRIx64,
>>> +                     (uint32_t)e->index, (uint64_t)e->data);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      assert(ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs);
>>>      return 0;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -2172,6 +2178,12 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
>>>          return ret;
>>>      }
>>>  
>>> +    if (ret < cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs) {
>>> +        struct kvm_msr_entry *e = &cpu->kvm_msr_buf->entries[ret];
>>> +        error_report("error: failed to get MSR 0x%" PRIx32,
>>> +                     (uint32_t)e->index);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      assert(ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs);
>>>      /*
>>>       * MTRR masks: Each mask consists of 5 parts
>>> -- 
>>> 2.11.0.259.g40922b1
>>>
>> --
>> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> 

Reply via email to