This commit set Makefile to point to ppc64le source for both archs
(ppc64 and ppc64le) because they do the exact same thing. The
difference is in risugen and how the binary is build.
Signed-off-by: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <jos...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
configure | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 055e6d6..dd64d8b 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -51,11 +51,7 @@ guess_arch() {
elif check_define __aarch64__ ; then
ARCH="aarch64"
elif check_define __powerpc64__ ; then
- if check_define __BIG_ENDIAN__; then
- ARCH="ppc64"
- else
- ARCH="ppc64le"
- fi
+ ARCH="ppc64le"
else
echo "This cpu is not supported by risu. Try -h. " >&2
exit 1
@@ -127,6 +123,9 @@ OBJDUMP="${OBJDUMP-${CROSS_PREFIX}objdump}"
if test "x${ARCH}" = "x"; then
guess_arch
+elif test "x${ARCH}" = "xppc64"; then
+ # ppc64 and ppc64le uses the same C source code
+ ARCH="ppc64le"
fi
generate_makefilein
--
2.7.4
