Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes:

> On 24 February 2017 at 14:40, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> The tests currently fail to build:
>>
>> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test6-kern.elf test6-kern.bin
>> test7.c: In function 'usage':
>> test7.c:58:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
>> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>>          testDiag("Ignoring bogus LR %x, doing return to handler", old_lr);
>>          ^
>> test7.c:76:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
>> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>>          testDiag("Ignoring bogus LR %x, doing return to thread", old_lr);
>>          ^
>> test7.c: In function 'svc':
>> test7.c:105:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
>> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>>          testDiag("New xPSR %x", sframe[7]);
>>          ^
>> test7.c:109:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
>> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>>          testDiag("old xPSR %x", sframe[7]);
>>          ^
>> test7.c:116:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
>> but argument 2 has type 'uint32_t' [-Werror=format=]
>>          testDiag("In SVC handler (direct call from main with LR %x)", 
>> old_lr);
>>          ^
>> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test8-kern.elf test8-kern.bin
>> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test9-kern.elf test9-kern.bin
>> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test10-kern.elf test10-kern.bin
>> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test11-kern.elf test11-kern.bin
>> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test13-kern.elf test13-kern.bin
>> /usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-objcopy -S -O binary test14-kern.elf test14-kern.bin
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>> Makefile:49: recipe for target 'test7.o' failed
>> make: *** [test7.o] Error 1
>> make: Target 'all' not remade because of errors.
>>
>> I suspect its the same thing as I came across with kvm-unit-tests that
>> compilers targeting the same abi can still disagree about sizes:
>>
>>   
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git/commit/?id=529046c397059b8c5ef4dc5fb3c258d86fafb126
>
> Could be. I use arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc to build. If you use
> PRIx32 does it build OK?

Well the problem is the non-eabi compilers don't have PRIx32 defined for
you. You have to specify yourself.

>
> thanks
> -- PMM


--
Alex Bennée

Reply via email to