On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:09:31PM +0800, Jaze Lee wrote: > 2017-02-24 11:52 GMT+08:00 Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com>: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:50:03PM +0800, jaze...@gmail.com wrote: > >> From: tianqing <tianq...@unitedstack.com> > >> > >> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform > >> iov to buf or vice versa any more. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: tianqing <tianq...@unitedstack.com> > >> --- > > > > > > This is marked as an RFC still - is this a series you would like to see in > > 2.9? > > Yes. What should i do if i like it in 2.9 >
Ideally you would submit the series as a non-RFC patch (that is, it would have progressed to a normal patch away from RFC). But in this case, it seems to me that this patch has progressed beyond RFC; is there any reason it is still marked as RFC instead of just a patch? It looks OK to me.
