Am 22.02.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> Instead of reporting host CPUID data on "max", use the qemu64 CPU
Two questions:
1. Shouldn't "max" use cpuid of qemu64 with TARGET_X86_64 and qemu32
with !TARGET_X86_64?
2. Should we then change linux-user/main.c:main() to use the "max" model?
> model as reference to initialize CPUID
> vendor/family/model/stepping/model-id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index f7bd59617e..5164cd9ed5 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -1594,6 +1594,15 @@ static void max_x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> if (lmce_supported()) {
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), true, "lmce",
> &error_abort);
> }
> + } else {
> + object_property_set_str(OBJECT(cpu), CPUID_VENDOR_AMD,
> + "vendor", &error_abort);
> + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), 6, "family", &error_abort);
> + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), 6, "model", &error_abort);
> + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), 3, "stepping", &error_abort);
> + object_property_set_str(OBJECT(cpu),
> + "QEMU TCG CPU version " QEMU_HW_VERSION,
> + "model-id", &error_abort);
> }
>
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), true, "pmu", &error_abort);
>
--
Thanks,
David
