On 9 February 2017 at 09:42, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > I see Peter and you are discussing what to document here. IMO, > we should simply state -nodefaults provides us a base mach-virt > board with no peripherals.
The thing about saying that is that it's not actually correct -- you get the UART, etc etc peripherals whether you say -nodefaults or not. I agree that listing them in multiple places isn't a good idea though. Maybe there's some wording that will work here. thanks -- PMM
