On 02/07/2017 10:31 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 02/07/2017 10:22 AM, Frederic Konrad wrote: >>> I see how these routines are used in patch 10/10. But if we were >>> open coding device CRF_APB, I don't think we would need them at >>> all and it would make the code a little simple IMHO. >> What do you mean by open coding? > > I mean to externalize the definition of the objects in a > header file. > > Then you can replace the type 'Object *' of the attribute > holding a reference to an instance by a non pointer type. > > Anyhow, I think we need to replace object_new() by > object_initialize() for QOM, and so we need to expose a > little more the object internals.
Ok got you. I'll take a look. Thanks, Fred > > Thanks, > > C. > >
