On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 05:25:15PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> From: Anton Nefedov <anton.nefe...@virtuozzo.com>
> 
> If explicit zeroing out before mirroring is required for the target image,
> it moves the block job offset counter to EOF, then offset and len counters
> count the image size twice. There is no harm but stats are confusing,
> specifically the progress of the operation is always reported as 99% by
> management tools.
> 
> The patch skips offset increase for the first "technical" pass over the
> image. This should not cause any further harm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Nefedov <anton.nefe...@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <d...@openvz.org>
> CC: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com>
> CC: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> CC: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
> CC: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - changed the approach - we do not allow to increase the offset rather then
>   to move it back
> - description rewritten
> - kludges to tests are removed as not actually needed with this approach
> 
>  block/mirror.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Another option is to put the flag in MirrorOp instead of MirrorBlockJob.
That reduces the scope of the variable, but this is okay too:

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to