On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 05:25:15PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote: > From: Anton Nefedov <anton.nefe...@virtuozzo.com> > > If explicit zeroing out before mirroring is required for the target image, > it moves the block job offset counter to EOF, then offset and len counters > count the image size twice. There is no harm but stats are confusing, > specifically the progress of the operation is always reported as 99% by > management tools. > > The patch skips offset increase for the first "technical" pass over the > image. This should not cause any further harm. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Nefedov <anton.nefe...@virtuozzo.com> > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <d...@openvz.org> > CC: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> > CC: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> > CC: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > CC: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > --- > Changes from v1: > - changed the approach - we do not allow to increase the offset rather then > to move it back > - description rewritten > - kludges to tests are removed as not actually needed with this approach > > block/mirror.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Another option is to put the flag in MirrorOp instead of MirrorBlockJob. That reduces the scope of the variable, but this is okay too: Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature