On 04/01/2017 11:47, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:42:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/01/2017 05:07, Jeff Cody wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:07:07PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29/11/2016 12:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Cleaning up the code and removing duplication makes it simpler to
>>>>> later adapt it for the multiqueue work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested against sheepdog 1.0.  I also tested taking snapshots and reverting
>>>>> to older snapshots, but the latter only worked with "dog vdi rollback".
>>>>> Neither loadvm nor qemu-img worked for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>
>>>>>         v1->v2: placate patchew
>>>>>         v2->v3: rebase
>>>>>
>>>>> Paolo Bonzini (5):
>>>>>   sheepdog: remove unused cancellation support
>>>>>   sheepdog: reorganize coroutine flow
>>>>>   sheepdog: do not use BlockAIOCB
>>>>>   sheepdog: simplify inflight_aio_head management
>>>>>   sheepdog: reorganize check for overlapping requests
>>>>>
>>>>>  block/sheepdog.c | 289 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------
>>>>>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 206 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2.8 is now out, so ping.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have a functional sheepdog setup at the moment; have you tested
>>> these patches, or should I set up a test rig for them? (I am guessing I
>>> should do the latter; either way, I'll pull the patches in once I or someone
>>> else has tested them).
>>
>> Yes, I have tested them.  Fedora's sheepdog package is fubar right now.
>> I've built an updated one and asked for ownership but haven't had any
>> answer yet.
>>
>> Paolo
> 
> Great, thanks.
> 
> Applied to my block branch:
> 
> git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
> 
> -Jeff
> 
> 

Ping?

Paolo

Reply via email to