On 26 January 2017 at 07:58, Auger Eric <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 20/01/2017 16:52, Peter Maydell wrote: >> So this patch added a no_its flag which gets set for virt-2.7 >> and earlier, but there's no user-facing way to say "I'd like >> a virt-2.8 board with no ITS", right? That's a bit unfortunate >> because the ITS can't be migrated, which means there's no way >> to ask for a post-2.7 virt board which can be migrated... > > Sorry for the delay. > > For 2.9 machine I can add a new property that would allow the user to > deselect the ITS. Would that make sense?
Maybe, but Christoffer pointed out to me that we can't do migration of the GICv3 yet anyway, so I was getting a bit ahead of myself -- non-migratable ITS doesn't break something that worked previously. So perhaps we're OK the way we are? thanks -- PMM
