On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:42:04PM -0800, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > Hi, > > Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for > more information:
I don't think this is a real problem: > Checking PATCH 46/67: target-ppc: Add xxextractuw instruction... > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis > #110: FILE: target/ppc/translate/vsx-ops.inc.c:52: > +#define GEN_XX2FORM_EXT(name, opc2, opc3, fl2) \ > +GEN_HANDLER2_E(name, #name, 0x3C, opc2 | 0, opc3, 0x00100000, PPC_NONE, > fl2), \ > +GEN_HANDLER2_E(name, #name, 0x3C, opc2 | 1, opc3, 0x00100000, PPC_NONE, fl2) > > total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 92 lines checked > > Your patch has style problems, please review. If any of these errors > are false positives report them to the maintainer, see > CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. This is the standard problem with checkpatch getting confused by the ugly, ugly macros in the instruction decode stuff. Maybe we'll fix that one day, but it's not a priority, and it's definitely out of scope for this patch. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature