Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> writes:

> So we can have portable formatting of uint32_t types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  lib/libcflat.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
> index bdcc561..6dab5be 100644
> --- a/lib/libcflat.h
> +++ b/lib/libcflat.h
> @@ -55,12 +55,17 @@ typedef _Bool             bool;
>  #define true  1
>
>  #if __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 8
> +#  define __PRI32_PREFIX
>  #  define __PRI64_PREFIX     "l"
>  #  define __PRIPTR_PREFIX    "l"
>  #else
> +#  define __PRI32_PREFIX        "l"

OK this is bogus, but the failure is because of where we get uint32_t
from (hint using arm32 compiler on a arm64 system) so I got:

  lib/pci.c:71:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', 
but argument 3 has type 'uint32_t {aka long unsigned int}' [-Werro\
r=format=]

Which makes me think we should be more careful about including system
headers in kvm-unit-tests (done in 75e777a0).

--
Alex Bennée

Reply via email to