Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/12/2010 07:10 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 09/12/2010 11:06 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> On 09/12/2010 05:26 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> On 09/12/2010 08:28 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >>>>> On 09/12/2010 03:06 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Backing files and logical size shouldn't change during live >>>>>> migration. >>>>> >>>>> Why not? >>>> >>>> To make our lives easier. >>> >>> It means management needs to block volume resize while a live >>> migration takes place. Since live migration is typically done by >>> the system automatically, while volume resize happens in response >>> to user request, this isn't a good idea. Both in terms of user >>> experience, and in terms of pushing more complexity to management. >> >> We don't do volume resize today so it's a moot point. >> > > Let's be prepared for the future.
This is better done when we would be able to create the machine during migration. As we have everything organized today, this is basically imposible :( The problem is not related with live migration, is related with the fact that we need to give the same arguments in both source & target machines. Later, Juan.
