On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 08:44:02PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: [...]
> > Anyway, IMHO squashing you suggestion of "trap exit SIGINT" at the > > entry of for_each_unittest() is an acceptable solution - it works in > > all cases. > > Seems like the best solution at this time ... > We actually want to "exit 130", as it would when using normal wait does, > and maybe it could be improved a bit by adding a wait: > > trap 'wait; exit 130' SIGINT Sounds better, thanks! Will repost with this one. -- peterx
