Am 14.09.2010 um 22:36 schrieb Blue Swirl:

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de > wrote:
diff --git a/osdep.h b/osdep.h
index 1cdc7e2..6fb4ff3 100644
--- a/osdep.h
+++ b/osdep.h
@@ -90,6 +90,41 @@ void *qemu_memalign(size_t alignment, size_t size);
 void *qemu_vmalloc(size_t size);
 void qemu_vfree(void *ptr);

+#define QEMU_MADV_INVALID -1
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_MADVISE)
+
+#define QEMU_MADV_WILLNEED  MADV_WILLNEED
+#define QEMU_MADV_DONTNEED  MADV_DONTNEED
+#ifdef MADV_DONTFORK
+#define QEMU_MADV_DONTFORK  MADV_DONTFORK
+#else
+#define QEMU_MADV_DONTFORK  QEMU_MADV_INVALID
+#endif
+#ifdef MADV_MERGEABLE
+#define QEMU_MADV_MERGEABLE MADV_MERGEABLE
+#else
+#define QEMU_MADV_MERGEABLE QEMU_MADV_INVALID
+#endif
+
+#elif defined(CONFIG_POSIX_MADVISE)
+
+#define QEMU_MADV_WILLNEED  POSIX_MADV_WILLNEED
+#define QEMU_MADV_DONTNEED  POSIX_MADV_DONTNEED
+#define QEMU_MADV_DONTFORK  POSIX_MADV_NORMAL
+#define QEMU_MADV_MERGEABLE POSIX_MADV_NORMAL

Shouldn't these two (or at least QEMU_MADV_DONTFORK) be defined to
QEMU_MADV_INVALID, so KVM check will fail as it should?

Oops, missed these two. Will fix tomorrow.

Thanks,
Andreas

Reply via email to