On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:01:24PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> We should only pass the hpet config entry in case we actually
> create a hpet device.
> 
No we should pass it always. If no hpets are present hpet_cfg will have
appropriate info.


> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/pc.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pc.c b/hw/pc.c
> index 0c31db1..c96f1fc 100644
> --- a/hw/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/pc.c
> @@ -517,8 +517,10 @@ static void *bochs_bios_init(void)
>      fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_E820_TABLE, (uint8_t *)&e820_table,
>                       sizeof(struct e820_table));
>  
> -    fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_HPET, (uint8_t *)&hpet_cfg,
> -                     sizeof(struct hpet_fw_config));
> +    if (!no_hpet) {
> +        fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_HPET, (uint8_t *)&hpet_cfg,
> +                         sizeof(struct hpet_fw_config));
> +    }
>      /* allocate memory for the NUMA channel: one (64bit) word for the number
>       * of nodes, one word for each VCPU->node and one word for each node to
>       * hold the amount of memory.
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 

--
                        Gleb.

Reply via email to