Hi Michael,
Pls pick up this one for 2.8.
Thanks,
-Gonglei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonglei (Arei)
> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2016 11:08 AM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: m...@redhat.com; Gonglei (Arei)
> Subject: [PATCH v2] virtio-crypto: fix uninitialized variables
>
> Though crypto_cfg.reserve is an unused field, let me
> initialize the structure in order to make coverity happy.
>
> *** CID 1365923: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT)
> /hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c: 851 in virtio_crypto_get_config()
> 845 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.mac_algo_h, c->conf.mac_algo_h);
> 846 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.aead_algo, c->conf.aead_algo);
> 847 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.max_cipher_key_len,
> c->conf.max_cipher_key_len);
> 848 stl_le_p(&crypto_cfg.max_auth_key_len,
> c->conf.max_auth_key_len);
> 849 stq_le_p(&crypto_cfg.max_size, c->conf.max_size);
> 850
> >>> CID 1365923: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT)
> >>> Using uninitialized value "crypto_cfg". Field "crypto_cfg.reserve"
> is uninitialized when calling "memcpy".
> [Note: The source code implementation of the function
> has been overridden by a builtin model.]
> 851 memcpy(config, &crypto_cfg, c->config_size);
> 852 }
> 853
>
> Rported-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gong...@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2: initialize the whole structure instead of the
> single crypto_cfg.reserve for better extension.
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
> index 847dc9d..2f2467e 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static Property virtio_crypto_properties[] = {
> static void virtio_crypto_get_config(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t *config)
> {
> VirtIOCrypto *c = VIRTIO_CRYPTO(vdev);
> - struct virtio_crypto_config crypto_cfg;
> + struct virtio_crypto_config crypto_cfg = {};
>
> /*
> * Virtio-crypto device conforms to VIRTIO 1.0 which is always LE,
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
