On November 21, 2016 7:35:28 AM PST, Vincent Bernat <vincent.ber...@exoscale.ch> wrote: > ❦ 21 novembre 2016 14:46 GMT, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> : > >> The commit description says it would be "far more complex" to >implement >> netascii. Is the LF -> CR LF and CR -> CR NUL transformation so >hard? > >Currently, the code uses lseek to send each block. It is just a matter >of doing nr_block*512. If there is a transformation, this cannot work >this way. But this can be done, we'll just have to maintain an offset. > >Not knowing the final size is not a problem, just send back 0 as the >size.
Incidentally, it would definitely be a good thing to enable the blksize extension. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
