On 16/11/2016 09:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
> automatically also means that we're running on a ppc64 host), and
> fall back to TCG otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/postcopy-test.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/postcopy-test.c b/tests/postcopy-test.c
> index d6613c5..dafe8be 100644
> --- a/tests/postcopy-test.c
> +++ b/tests/postcopy-test.c
> @@ -380,17 +380,21 @@ static void test_migrate(void)
> " -incoming %s",
> tmpfs, bootpath, uri);
> } else if (strcmp(arch, "ppc64") == 0) {
> + const char *accel;
> +
> + /* On ppc64, the test only works with kvm-hv, but not with kvm-pr */
> + accel = access("/sys/module/kvm_hv", F_OK) ? "tcg" : "kvm:tcg";
why not "kvm" instead of "kvm:tcg"?
If it doesn't work it should fail.
Laurent
