On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:52:58PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 08:09:58PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > libvhost-user is the only thing that might be controvertial here, but it's > > only > > affecting contrib/ and tests so I think it's still fair game, and several > > people were asking for it. > > I am being firm about the freeze policy. Only fixes are allowed. > Please send a v3 without libvhost-user.
What's a fix is at some level in the eye of the beholder. Consider Igor's patch removing an unused fw cfg file, is this a fix? In the past it was maintainer's decision. This one cleans up test code. > I understand that people want libvhost-user. Please merge it in a -next > branch and have them base their work on that. > > Stefan Well I feel bad about it. It was ready in time, I deferred it because there was so much other stuff that I did not want it to interfere with. I was sure it's ok - it's just a test change, I don't really see why we need to enforce policy for tests, they are not used in production. Let's make an exception for once? -- MST
