Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 18:17:05 -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
<snip>
>> I also tried to test with exactly the same build parameters with the
>> previous commit of above (09cd058a2c, "intel_iommu: get rid of {0}
>> initializers"), it has the same problem (TCG version cannot boot guest
>> kernel if I provide a disk as parameter).
>
> Hmm that's interesting, on my end 09cd05^ works well 100% of the time
> w/ TCG.
>
>> Do we still support gthread as coroutine backend? And to what extend
>> do we support it?
>
> I don't know :( That's why I sent the message.
>
> I'll investigate further.
We would like to drop it but tsan only works with it at the moment. We
are exploring what it would take to support the other setcontext/longjmp
backends in tsan, see:
Message-ID: <871t8kwygw....@linaro.org>
On the thread-sanitizer mailing list. If we can get it working then we
can drop QEMU's gthread backend.
--
Alex Bennée
