On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:12:20 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The following changes since commit 6bbcb76301a72dc80c8d29af13d40bb9a759c9c6: > > MAINTAINERS: Remove obsolete stable branches (2016-11-10 15:29:59 +0000) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git tags/for_upstream > > for you to fetch changes up to 8038753b86f4cb1e79d4225a799395c4dae96b17: > > docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines (2016-11-10 18:08:06 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > virtio, vhost, pc, pci: tests, documentation, fixes and cleanups > > Lots of fixes all over the place. I allowed some cleanups in even though they > are not strictly bugfixes, they might prevent bugs and seem very safe. > > Most importantly, this fixes a regression with vhost introduced > by the last pull. I think I'm hitting this previous regression, I see this in my libvirt log: kvm_mem_ioeventfd_add: error adding ioeventfd: File exists And a backtrace as seen here https://paste.fedoraproject.org/477562/88144131/ So I merge this tag to try to resolve it, now I get qemu segfaulting bisected to: commit a6d8372bc6764ee279b473d13ff4ecc8acb7a978 Author: Cao jin <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Sat Nov 5 10:07:21 2016 +0800 hcd-xhci: check & correct param before using it And if I revert that, vhost still fails with: qemu-system-x86_64: /net/gimli/home/alwillia/Work/qemu.git/memory.c:2012: memory_region_del_eventfd: Assertion `i != mr->ioeventfd_nb' failed. So I think this does not fix the previous regression and adds a new one :-\ Thanks, Alex
