On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 07:19:16 +0100 Ladi Prosek <lpro...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> wrote: > > On 03/11/16 19:55, Ladi Prosek wrote: > >> The function undoes the effect of virtqueue_pop and doesn't do anything > >> destructive or irreversible so virtqueue_unpop is a more fitting name. > > > > virtqueue_undo_pop() is even better, it was suggested by native english > > speaker (i.e. not myself) :) > > virtqueue_undo_pop sounds good too, I have no preference between the > two really :) Thanks! If you need a tie breaker: I like virtqueue_undo_pop() better :)
