On 1 November 2016 at 14:14, Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote: > PS: > Looks like with new soft-freeze rules we just have one big > hard-freeze window and people trying to frantically squeeze > in features last minute. > I think previous soft-freeze rules worked better where > maintainers were still allowed merge features at their > discretion if series would converge in soft-freeze time > frame and be important/low risk one. Like the case here.
But you get an extra week before softfreeze deadline (ie softfreeze is 2 weeks rather than 3), so it evens out a bit. At a week into old-style softfreeze you as a submaintainer should probably have been pushing back on this as late for a new feature anyway. thanks -- PMM
