Well, technically qobject output visitor, but keeping the cover letter subject unchanged helps for continuity
Given the threads last week with Pino's claim that we had a memory leak, and Markus' counter-claim that the proposed patch was reverting an earlier double-free fix, I ended up enhancing the testsuite to prove under valgrind whether we indeed have a problem. The good news is that the existing visitor code is correct, but having more tests will help prevent future regression attempts :) v1 was here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg05699.html since then: patch 2 is new patch 3 (former 2/2) is rebased (now that it is qobject rather than qmp visitor) and enhanced (list and alternates, in addition to objects) Eric Blake (3): tests: Simplify expected error checking for qmp output qapi: Further enhance visitor virtual walk doc example tests: Enhance qobject output to cover partial visit include/qapi/visitor.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------- tests/test-qobject-output-visitor.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4
