On 10/25/2016 10:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 25 October 2016 at 16:26, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 25 October 2016 at 08:33, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Yes, I prefer it to not being able to easily switch a command line from >>> KVM to TCG. Granted, right now we mostly need to run with -cpu host for >>> KVM, which also needs to be switched for TCG. However that will hopefully >>> change with Shannon's work. >> >> If the TCG default is different from the KVM default then you >> will have problems with switching it anyway, because it will >> silently change behaviour underfoot. I think we should avoid that... > > So here's my suggestion: we should just not worry about printing > a warning for not actually honouring the "please give me a PMU" > flag under TCG. At some point we'll actually implement it, > at which point the problem goes away. In the meantime (a) not > providing a PMU and not bothering to say so is what we were > doing before, and (b) there's lots of bits of the CPU that we > don't actually yet implement in TCG but which will appear as > we fix bugs in the emulation.
This is easy to implement. If Drew is OK with silence under TCG mode, I will send V8 out. > > thanks > -- PMM >
