On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:53:31 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> No, it's because virtio-mmio can be created without a device
> underneath. virtio_bus_start_ioeventfd in that case is wrong, but
> virtio_bus_stop_ioeventfd should be a no-op. The fix is trivial:
I tend to forget this virtio-mmio speciality...
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> index 0479704..bf61f66 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> @@ -172,12 +172,15 @@ int virtio_bus_start_ioeventfd(VirtioBusState *bus)
>
> void virtio_bus_stop_ioeventfd(VirtioBusState *bus)
> {
> - VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(bus);
> - VirtioDeviceClass *vdc = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
> + VirtIODevice *vdev;
> + VirtioDeviceClass *vdc;
>
> if (!bus->ioeventfd_started) {
> return;
> }
> +
> + vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(bus);
> + vdc = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
> vdc->stop_ioeventfd(vdev);
> bus->ioeventfd_started = false;
> }
Looks sane, and make check passes with this applied.
