On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:53:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Hi all, > > another small PSA. :) I have created a small but hopefully useful > example of a new QEMU website at http://qemu-bonzini.rhcloud.com/. The > site aims at providing and also a home for blog posts about QEMU. > > The site resides in a single git tree, so that requests to modify the > pages (and even blog posts :)) can be posted to qemu-devel as usual. > > The blog post in there is dummy, and the "blog" link will be removed > from navigation until there's a first post, if the site goes online. > > The site is designed to live together with the wiki and provide a > migration path for qemu-project.org, from the wiki to a standalone > website. For example: > > - http://qemu-bonzini.rhcloud.com/Download redirects to the new page > http://qemu-bonzini.rhcloud.com/download > > - http://qemu-bonzini.rhcloud.com/BiteSizedTasks redirects to the wiki > page http://wiki.qemu-project.org/BiteSizedTasks > > - http://qemu-bonzini.rhcloud.com/foobar is a 404 page > > Impressions, ideas and lart-ing for my feeble attempts at Javascript > (now I understand why people are so keen on stackoverflow!) and graphic > design are welcome. (Yes, the icons in the homepage are not definitive).
My main question is about the styling + logo. We have a logo for QEMU, but neither the old website nor your new website use it. http://wiki.qemu.org/Logo It has a quite distinct black + orange colourscheme, which IMHO doesn't fit with the greenish colour scheme you've used here. Do we still like that logo ? If so, we should use it, and align the website colour scheme with that logo colourscheme, so we have a consistent brand style. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
