On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> wrote: > Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya: >> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: >>> >>>> One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an >>>> option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several >>>> runtime_opts? The reason I ask this because the uri syntax for NFS in >>>> QEMU looks like this: >>>> >>>> >>>> nfs://<host>/<export>/<filename>[?param=value[¶m2=value2[&...]]] >>> >>> It's actually nfs://<host>[:port]/... >>> >>> so the URI syntax already supports port. >> >> But the commit message which added support for NFS had the uri which I >> mentioned above and the code for NFS does not make use of 'port' >> anywhere either, which is why I am a bit confused. > > > Hi Aschijeet, > > don't worry there is no port number when connecting to an NFS server. > The portmapper always listens on port 111. So theoretically we could > specifiy a port in the URL but it is ignored.
So that means I will be including 'port' in runtime_opts and then just ignoring any value that comes through it? Ashijeet > > BR, > Peter
