On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:54:26AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/26/2010 02:59 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >>>Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel > >>>lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth > >>>trying. > >>Didn't try win7, but for winxp it is a *huge* difference. > >> > >On which HW? My guess is this is because of tpr patching. > > Does Windows 7 hit the TPR heavily? I thought all modern versions > of Windows significantly reduced their interactions with the TPR. > Windows 7 doesn't. tpr patching explains only winxp slowdown. -- Gleb.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu? Anthony Liguori
- [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? walt
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? Anthony Liguori
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qem... Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than... Gleb Natapov
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster... Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm fa... Alexander Graf
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm fa... Gleb Natapov
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm fa... Avi Kivity
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster... Anthony Liguori
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm fa... Gleb Natapov
- [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? walt
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than... Avi Kivity