On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/24/2010 03:07 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:42:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > >>>Add Cc: m...@redhat.com. > >>> > >>>MAX_PCI_SLOTS should be in pci.h instead of qdev.h? > >>>And the name should be start with PCI_ prefix for consistency? > >>> > >>>Except that, the patches look okay. > >>> > >>These aren't slots, are they? They are functions. > >The function checks if given $slot.$fn (or $slot) is valid. > >So it's slots. max 32. > > + assert(devfn< PCIBUS_MAX_DEVICES); > > > Looks like we're comparing a function number to PCIBUS_MAX_DEVICES. >
PCIBUS_MAX_DEVICES is the size of PCIBus.devices[], I have added it in the first patch at the defination of struct PCIBus, line 50 hw/pci.c. so i think the better name of the macro should be PCIBUS_MAX_FN, right? Ken > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html --
