On 06/10/2016 13:10, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 October 2016 at 12:07, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> My hunch is that it would be a drop in the sea if monitor.c were >> refactored properly. > > Speaking of refactoring, is there scope for splitting things > up so that if the foo subsystem needs to implement a monitor > command it can just call a function for "register this monitor > command handler" rather than having to add an entry to a single > file listing all the commands ?
Sure... I think the hardest part would be rigging the Makefiles to keep the docs complete. Paolo
