On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:35:29PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote: >> object_new_with_object_class() was a close contender for the name, but >> it is longer, the type system will catch possible errors, and the only >> reasonable replacement would be a polymorphic function that would not >> break existing users. >> >> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> Thanks, Alistair > > -- > Eduardo >
