On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 02:32:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 September 2016 at 15:41, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> > > > > --- > > > > This will conflict with Wei's PMU property series (which is why I > > asked him to add it to that series...), but anyway, it'll be a minor > > resolution to make. > > --- > > There wasn't a textual conflict but it (slightly belatedly) > occured to me that perhaps the "support KVM GICv3 ITS" patches > which went in to master in the same pullreq as this might > need some tweaks so the ITS doesn't get used in the 2.7 > machine. Would you or Eric A like to have a look? >
Good call. We should avoid guest visible changes, even when the changes complete already exposed devices. I'll send a patch. Thanks, drew
