Hi Rafael, Daniel, On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:22 PM Rafael David Tinoco < rafael.tin...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Let me work on it. I'll get back soon. > > thanks for working on it, before that I have a few questions: Tks Daniel. > > > On Oct 04, 2016, at 05:36, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > >> Yes, definitely. Check this: > > > > [snip] > > > > So in that case, I think we must add ability to specify an explicit path > > that apps can use *regardles* of whether memfd support exists or not. > How will this path be used? Is it going to be global to qemu for various use (kinda like $TMP), or per-device, or for memfd fallback only? Should the path pre-exist? (I suppose, if not, qemu should clean it up when leaving) > > >>> On Oct 03, 2016, at 15:46, Rafael David Tinoco < > rafael.tin...@canonical.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> So you're saying that the file descriptor here is actually getting > >>>> passed to a different process for it to use ? > > > -- Marc-André Lureau
