On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:05:47PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 11:51 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > Ok, as noted elsewhere, I think you need to disassociate the PIR value > > from the cpu_index. It may be a little less elegant, but it'll make > > your life much easier in the short and medium term. > > > > Apart from that, this looks pretty good, though I have one suggested > > cleanup below. > > As long as the PIR value is what is used everywhere, ie, interrupt > controller, XSCOM addressing of the cores, Doorbells, etc...
Right, obviously the physical ID needs to be used for all the guest
visible interfaces.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
