On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:41:38 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:04:37 +0200
> Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> wrote:
> 
> > As with other virtio-* qtests, PC platform is assumed.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Greg Kurz (3):
> >       tests: virtio-9p: introduce start/stop functions
> >       tests: virtio-9p: add basic configuration test
> >       tests: virtio-9p: add basic transaction test
> > 
> > 
> >  tests/Makefile.include |    2 -
> >  tests/virtio-9p-test.c |  179 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >   
> 
> I took a quick look and nothing bad jumped out at me, but that is
> probably not saying much :/
> 

Not much is a lot more than nothing, as it is usually the case with 9pfs
patches that don't fix security issues or deprecated glibc calls ;)

Can this "nothing bad jumped out" be formalized into an Acked-by ?

Thanks.

--
Greg

Reply via email to