On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:41:38 +0200 Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:04:37 +0200 > Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> wrote: > > > As with other virtio-* qtests, PC platform is assumed. > > > > --- > > > > Greg Kurz (3): > > tests: virtio-9p: introduce start/stop functions > > tests: virtio-9p: add basic configuration test > > tests: virtio-9p: add basic transaction test > > > > > > tests/Makefile.include | 2 - > > tests/virtio-9p-test.c | 179 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > I took a quick look and nothing bad jumped out at me, but that is > probably not saying much :/ > Not much is a lot more than nothing, as it is usually the case with 9pfs patches that don't fix security issues or deprecated glibc calls ;) Can this "nothing bad jumped out" be formalized into an Acked-by ? Thanks. -- Greg