On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/09/2016 00:29, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> smp_read_barrier_depends() should be used only if you are reading
>> dependent pointers which are shared.
>
> bh is shared since it is equal to ctx->first_bh or
> ctx->first_bh->...->next.  While the compiler will always order the load
> of bh->next after the load of ctx->first_bh and any previous load of
> bh->next, this may not be the case for the processor.  Only the DEC
> Alpha has this behavior, but it _can_ happen.

In that case there are a bunch of places in the same file where we
need to insert this barrier. I also guarantee that there are many more
files which would need this barrier if we examine closely.

I really doubt if we see this kind of re-ordering. Did we ever get any
bug reports about running qemu on an SMP Alpha?

smp_read_barrier_depends() is evil and I would prefer we get rid of it.

Thanks,
-- 
Pranith

Reply via email to